![]() This book will be of interest to scholars in contemporary art, history of art, film and literary studies, protest movements, and social movements.ĪB - This book examines how renewed forms of artistic activism were developed in the wake of the neoliberal repression since the 1980s. The authors engage in a dialogue with these artistic efforts and their histories - in particular the earlier artistic activism that was developed during the civil rights era in the 1960s and 70s - providing valuable historical insight and new conceptual reflection on the future of aesthetic resilience. The volume shows the diverse ways in which artists have sought to confront systemic crises around the globe, searching for new and enduring forms of building communities and reimagining the political horizon. N2 - This book examines how renewed forms of artistic activism were developed in the wake of the neoliberal repression since the 1980s. ![]() NEW! Pittsburgh Artists Working in Community: A Case Study of Aesthetic Perspectives in Action (24 pages)Īs Pittsburgh’s Office of Public Art (OPA) supports artists working in the public realm through residencies and cross-sector partnerships, this case study explores how OPA has used Aesthetic Perspectives as: an adaptable evaluation tool, a content-rich guide for artist inquiry and exchange, and an organizational aid to guide selection panels to discuss aesthetic qualities and equity.Ī focused OVERVIEW of the 11 aesthetic attributes offers abbreviated descriptions and a sampling of the questions found in the full Aesthetics FrameworkĪ poster for each of the 11 aesthetic attributes offers a VISUAL TOOL describing the attribute’s relationship to social justice and sample questions for use in teaching/training, funding panel processes, to guide dialogues and discussions of Arts for Change work.T1 - Art and activism in the age of systemic crisis Published by Animating Democracy in collaboration with the MAP Fund. Learn how MAP is incorporating the framework, Aesthetic Perspectives: Attributes of Excellence in Arts for Change to help mitigate aesthetic bias in proposal review, and what an evaluation revealed. In this case study by Vanessa Whang, follow MAP’s layered inquiry to examine biases in its: application platform, guidelines and requirements, applicant advisory supports and communications, and adjudication processes. In 2015, the MAP Fund undertook a deep examination of one of its foundational priorities: racial equity in arts and culture grantmaking. NEW!Diving into Racial Equity: The MAP Fund’s Exploration (28 pages ) Written by respected peers, Companion guides for: Artists, Funders, Evaluators, Educators, and Curators offer ideas and insights to help these users APPLY THE FRAMEWORK to address their needs and interests. Offers a SUMMARY of the 11 attributes and rational and context for the framework. llluminating EXAMPLES of creative projects that exhibit the attribute.reflective QUESTIONS to guide consideration of the attribute in Arts for Change work.pointed DESCRIPTION relating the attribute to Arts for Change.For each of the 11 AESTHETIC ATTRIBUTES, you’ll find: Includes an INTRODUCTION that explores rationale and context and the terms aesthetics and Arts for Change. ![]() ![]() Activation of the framework supported by Hemera Foundation. ![]() Aesthetic Perspectives was developed by artists and allied funders and evaluators who participated in the Evaluation Learning Lab led by Animating Democracy at Americans for the Arts, in partnership with the Nathan Cummings Foundation and the Arts x Culture x Social Justice Network. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |